Homepage  |   E-mail this article  |   Print





Advertisement

See Also:

Failed TIF bid cost AGMA more than £20m

11:57 am, December 12, 2008
Congestion charge plans thrown out

Greater Manchester’s residents have overwhelmingly thrown out plans to introduce a congestion charge.

More than half (53.2 per cent) returned their ballot papers and and in all ten boroughs a majority voted No.

Of the total votes cast, 812,815 (78.8 per cent) were for No and 218,860 (21.2 per cent ) voted Yes.

In some boroughs the proportion voting No was more than 80 per cent, notably Stockport where the No votes were more than 103,000 (81.3 per cent) with only 24,000 voting Yes.

Around 1.94m ballot papers were sent out across the 10 districts, with people asked to vote on whether they wanted to see a weekday, peak-time only congestion charge introduced in the city.

The result of the referendum was announced today by returning officer Sir Neil McIntosh shortly after noon at Manchester Central.

The Association of Greater Manchester Authorities said the Transport Innovation Fund (TIF) bid was a once-only opportunity to secure a £2.7bn investment in public transport.

The scheme would have seen drivers paying up to £5 per day to commute across two rings around Manchester city centre during the morning and afternoon peak hours.

Sir Richard Leese, Leader of Manchester City Council, said: "The referendum has given a very clear outcome. I'm sure the economic downturn, which is hitting everyone hard, has had a part to play. Investment in public transport in Manchester will remain a priority for the city council and our commitment to face up to the challenges going forward remains undiminished."

The Association of Greater Manchester Authorities’ leader Lord Peter Smith said he was “disappointed” with the outcome and added that Agma would have to consider the outcome at a meeting next week. He said the result wasn’t just a ‘no’ vote for the congestion charge, but also for improvements to the Metrolink and Greater Manchester’s public transport network.

Paul Henly, regional policy manager for the Federation of Smal Business said that AGMA “should now respect the wishes of the people of Greater Manchester and we urge them to withdraw the current transport proposals at their meeting in a week’s time”.

Malcom Edge, norther chairman of accountancy firm KPMG, which advised Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive on the bid last year, said that he was “immensely disappointed” with the outcome.

“This funding would have allowed us to take the steps necessary to ensure we continue to punch above our weight on the global stage,” he said.

"However, it is accepted that this has always been a complex and emotive debate. With the public now coming to terms with the prospect of economic recession, the potential increased cost of travel that the congestion charge would bring was always going to be difficult to embrace.”

Results in detail

Bolton:

Yes 20,529

No 76,910

Rejected votes 167

Turnout 48.8%

Bury:

Yes 16,563

No 64,001

Rejected votes 94

Turnout 57.4%

Manchester:

Yes 43,593

No 113,064

Rejected votes 250

Turnout 46.1%

Oldham:

Yes 17,571

No 68, 884

Rejected votes 141

Turnout 54.4%

Rochdale:

Yes 17,333

No 61,686

Rejected votes 118

Turnout 50.8%

Salford:

Yes 14,603

No 79,326

Rejected votes 105

Turnout 57%



Stockport:

Yes 24,090

No 103,706

Rejected votes 169

Turnout 59%

Tameside:

Yes 16,323

No 83,105

Rejected votes 124

Turnout 60.7%

Trafford

Yes 20,445

No 83,568

Rejected votes 142

Turnout 63.6%

Wigan:

Yes 27,810

No 78,565

Rejected votes 132

Turnout 45.3%



Comments?manchesternews@crain.com



  Browse for stories by:


  • Arts, Culture and Entertainment
  • Automotive
  • Banking and Finance
  • Beverages
  • Business Organisations
  • Computing and Information Technology
  • Construction
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Financial and Business Services
  • Health Care
  • Hospitality/Hotels
  • Law/Legal News
  • Manufacturing/Engineering
  • Property
  • Quoted companies
  • Recruitment/Appointments
  • Regeneration
  • Retail
  • Sports
  • Telecommunications
  • Transport
  • Home    |    About Us    |    Subscriptions    |    Advertising    |    Editorial Calendar 2010   |    Contact Us   |    Privacy Statement    |    Disclaimer     

              | Use of editorial content without permission is strictly prohibited. All rights reserved.